On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 11:32:21 AM AEST Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:24:39AM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > On Monday, 25 April 2016 4:37:56 PM AEST Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> > > If ghi is the only consumer of ruby-ghi then I don't see any reason to
> > > introduce a new package. So I suggest to merge.
> >
> > Thank you, I'll consider merging.
>
> please do that as _all_ team packages have merged upstream sources.
So idea is to ship only "ghi" package with exacutable and library instead of
two packages. I'll do that, thanks. Hah, it is easy to comply with that. ;)
Thank you for briefing be on team practice.
--
Cheers,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
-- Christopher Hitchens, 2004
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.