Re: Jekyll update

[Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>]

Dear Harlan,

At Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:11:55 +0200,
Dominique Dumont <dod@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 31 May 2014 16:08:31 Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> > If I had to pick one, I think I'd probably go with #3, in the desperate
> > hopes that the two "plugins" can simply be fixed at whatever version
> > they are at the time of the main jekyll update and that we won't run
> > into problems needing an update of one of them between jekyll updates.
> > But, I'm not the maintainer, so I'm happy to do it however you guys and
> > gals would like.
>
> Given that Debian contributor (*) time is limited, I'd shoot for the
> solution that limit the work on contributor's time (provided users are
> not impacted), i.e. solution #1: create a package per gem. (like
> ruby-jekyll-test-plugin)

+1

I'll create some new packages ASAP.

> > If you'd like to look at my work so far, I've put it up at
> > https://github.com/hlieberman/debian-jekyll.

Thanks for your work. I merge your work in our pkg-ruby-extras/jekyll repos.

If you can, please push our repos directly.

> You could also push your work on a new branch on pkg-ruby-extras/jekyll repo.
> This would avoid reviewers to add a remote to their git repo.

Best wishes,
Youhei
---
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
              <uwabami@debian.or.jp>
GPG fingerprint:
  4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07