Re: Status on ITP ruby-launchy ?

[Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>]

Hi, sorry for late response.

At Sun, 9 Mar 2014 11:19:57 +0100,
Cédric Boutillier <boutil@debian.org> wrote:
> 
- snip- 
>
> I think we should evaluate what is the more expensive in terms of
> maintenance costs, between:
> - having a ruby-launchy package
> - maintaining simple patches to replace launchy by something else in
>   other packages.

Hmm.

> I am not saying that I am against a ruby-launchy package, not at all. And
> probably, if we package more libraries  using launchy, it will be
> unavoidable to package it. I just consider that as of today, it is more
> efficient to just replace the use of launchy by xdg-open in the one or two
> applications we maintain and may need it.

Ok. I follow your opition. 
I'll try/apply simple patch for jekyll (and next, tDiary).

Best Wishes
Youhei

---
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
              <uwabami@debian.or.jp>
GPG fingerprint:
  4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07