[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ruby-roodi 2.2.0-1



Hi,

On Martes, 9 de julio de 2013 07:38:25 Cédric Boutillier escribió:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:07:59PM +0200, David Suárez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
> > points listed on
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
> > 
> > Could you please sponsor them?
> > 
> >   ruby-roodi 2.2.0-1
> 
> Thanks for your
> I don't know this software and haven't tried it. But I looked at the
> packaging and I have a few comments and questions:
> - debian/control: the short description shouldn't be a full phrases.
>   Leave maybe just Ruby object oriented design inferometer. In principle
>   it shouldn't have capital letters (unless needed). Since it is an
>   acronym, it would be fine but the acronym is again presented in the
>   long description.
> - put-config-on-roodi-dir branch: is /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/roodi the
>   right place to put the config? I think it would be more appropriate in
>   /etc/ since it is the default configuration for the binary.
> - History.txt should be installed as the upstream changelog, not as
>   documentation. Use override_dh_installchangelog target in debian/rules
>   for that.
> - in the bin/* files, I would remove the LOAD_PATH change, since it
>   would be wrong once the files installed in /usr/bin
> - I don't see why in feature/upgrade-to-rspec2 branch, you changed
>   Rakefile, Gemfile and Gemfile.lock, since they are not used to build
>   the package. Is it a patch you forwarded upstream for inclusion in a
>   later version?
> - In debian/copyright, the first line of the Expat license
>   Copyright (c) 1998, 1999, 2000 Thai Open Source Software Center Ltd
>   should be removed as it doesn't seem to be related.
> - rake should be added to Build-Depends: to run tests with ruby1.8
> - since bin/roodi seems to be the interesting piece of this gem,
>   shouldn't the package be called roodi instead of ruby-roodi (like what
>   we have for cucumber, yard, chef, etc.?
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Cédric

Updated.

Thanks,

David


Reply to: