[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: messagebus_ruby_api package naming



2 or 3 in the order of preference, and we already have ruby*ruby* packages in the repo:

$ ls -1d ruby*ruby*
ruby-ruby2ruby
ruby-rubyforge
ruby-rubymail
ruby-rubypants
ruby-rubytorrent
ruby-rubyvis

O.


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Praveen A <pravi.a@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I chose messagebus-ruby-api as package name because the package itself
had ruby in it and adding extra ruby seemed redundant. Also yajl-ruby
is just ruby-yajl.

But discussing with Cedric he pointed out it should be ruby-* and to
ask this list for suggestions.

So my preference,

1. keep it the same messagebus-ruby-api
2. change it to ruby-messagebus-api
3. change it to ruby-messagebus-ruby-api

Please suggest.

Thanks
Praveen
--
പ്രവീണ്‍ അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്‍
You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your
rights from them; you give them permission to rule, only so long as
they follow the rules: laws and constitution.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] CAOo+eVp-FFWCf2p9V6+yf62MiX2q16QvDAFqFzQY5Cy3of6jtg@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] CAOo+eVp-FFWCf2p9V6+yf62MiX2q16QvDAFqFzQY5Cy3of6jtg@mail.gmail.com




--
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>

Reply to: