Re: Regarding gitlab
- To: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Regarding gitlab
- From: Per Andersson <avtobiff@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 18:14:32 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] CABYrXSRCtWk+Jkfxv0oeHwTFoXJX28yQzBVTBtnSOq-u-NAv2A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20130313101509.GA2470@royal.lan>
- References: <CABYrXSRX3KQSiYUwnvVPN0V--bBwQezoiQtzcp9E3ueYqYsabA@mail.gmail.com> <20130120222644.GA3680@royal> <20130120233531.GA15631@spin> <20130123144040.GA13582@debian.org> <20130123222200.GA8818@spin> <CABYrXSQRh_=_=yr3H1mtygyxSd8+B57R3OwNpiSp9Pv_NRJryA@mail.gmail.com> <20130124133607.GA8738@debian.org> <20130303193309.GA8176@royal> <20130303202956.GB24543@royal> <CABYrXSRj-82T=r70BSj1qk0wgnbYk9N35QaM5p+NYAY3auHoeg@mail.gmail.com> <20130313101509.GA2470@royal.lan>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc> wrote:
> (You don't need to CC me, I am already in the debian ruby lists)
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:24:52 +0100, Per Andersson wrote:
>> What are the changes that are incompatible with original upstream?
>
> As he said, "fixes and improvements". I did ask him if he could include
> them upstream, but got no reply so far. Will try again.
>
> Anyway, the changes are on github if you want to see them.
>
>> I suppose I would rather patch gitlab to use vanilla grit, if possible.
>
> Patching gitlab would be too much effort on our part IMHO, which would
> be replaced by a cooperative upstream. Thus why we're talking to Dmitriy
> :)
>
> I'll keep you posted.
Any update on this?
Best,
Per
Reply to: