On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi! > > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 06:44:06PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > [breaking the original thread] > > > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 04:18:10PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > > debian/copyright: > > > - it is considered good practice to chose for the license of debian/* > > > files the same license as upstream to ease distribution. > > > Does anyone object to adjusting the dh-make-ruby template to say that > > by default? (see attached patch) > > Maybe something more like the attached patch? I would use a standalone > paragraph, avoiding to repeat the text of the license. The Comment: > field serves as an indication and could be removed, if wished by the > maintainer. What do you think? Cool. I'll apply your patch instead of mine. :-) -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature