Re: RFS: ruby-capistrano-ext

To: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: ruby-capistrano-ext
From: Cédric Boutillier <cedric.boutillier@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 23:06:31 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20121202220631.GA20318@spin>
Mail-followup-to: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20121202215550.GA24645@hysteria.proulx.com>
References: <CAOo+eVpNghSg7oKY-cSQA8TJWPgxmQmbdeCM3P2KEOE8GruWKA@mail.gmail.com> <20120208233942.GB31733@debian.org> <CADk97TxrbhuRgPP+qxkxKTG7RcsN_XkV9d8+xmOni9OztUUovg@mail.gmail.com> <20120330220544.GG4923@debian.org> <20120403002856.GA17780@hysteria.proulx.com> <CAOo+eVqrJGfwFKY8oQ55h-ri7e91P6rsctONdmU1Lgbyy1FpTA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20121202215550.GA24645@hysteria.proulx.com>

Hi!

On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 02:55:50PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:

> Ping?  Was there an error in the upload?  It never seems to have made
> it into the Debian archive.

>   http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all&section=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=capistrano

> I only see the two matches capistrano and ruby-capistrano-colors and
> do not see capistrano-ext.

It made it to the archive, but its removal was requested
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693709
because it is marked by upstream as deprecated, as many features have
been merged into ruby-capistrano (see the comment in the bug report).
So it was removed from the archive not long after having entered it.

Cheers,

Cédric

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: ruby-capistrano-ext
  - From: Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com>

References:
- Re: RFS: ruby-capistrano-ext
  - From: Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: ruby-capistrano-ext
Next by Date: Re: RFS: ruby-capistrano-ext
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: ruby-capistrano-ext
Next by thread: Re: RFS: ruby-capistrano-ext
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread