On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:54:02PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hm. The fact that this file is not present in the upstream tarball we > are using is a problem, then. If this file is present, we can assume > that whatever is written in it is valid. > The reason why came up with my original suggestion in the first place > was because I didn't found a proper copyright notice. > > This might be a naive question, but are all contributors supposed to be > > copyright holders? > > > > I am willing to modifying the debian/copyright to take into account the > > other contributors, but I could not obtain the year(s) for the > > contribution of Aleksandar Simic (no public commit or message to mailing > > list found...) I asked upstream to update the copyright notice in the > > LICENSE file, and I am waiting for their answer. > As far as we are concerned, just requiring a proper copyright notice > (i.e. the LICENSE file) should be enough. Ok, then. I psuhed to the repository a git snapshot containing the LICENSE file, and left the debian/copyright as it was, in agreement with the LICENSE file. Cédric
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature