Re: RFS: ruby-chronic 0.6.7-1, ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-1, ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1, ruby-trollop 1.16.2-1, sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1
Hi!
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> wrote:
> Gunnar Wolf dijo [Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:04:16PM -0500]:
>>
>> I have to
>> leave quite soon, but will try to take a look at sup-mail, and if all
>> goes well, I'll upload it as well.
>
> Nope - I built sup-mail, but as it is not a regular Ruby library and
> it does not build with a test suite, I'd not feel very comfortable
> uploading it without doing the most basic functionality test.
I'll have a look at sup-mail then.
Any pointers on what can be wrong or needs to be fixed?
--
Per
> Greetings,
Reply to:
- References:
- RFS: ruby-chronic 0.6.7-1, ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-1, ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1, ruby-trollop 1.16.2-1, sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1
- From: Per Andersson <avtobiff@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: ruby-chronic 0.6.7-1, ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-1, ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1, ruby-trollop 1.16.2-1, sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1
- From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org>
- Re: RFS: ruby-chronic 0.6.7-1, ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-1, ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1, ruby-trollop 1.16.2-1, sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1
- From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org>
- Prev by Date:
Re: RFS: ruby-chronic 0.6.7-1, ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-1, ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1, ruby-trollop 1.16.2-1, sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1
- Next by Date:
Re: RFS: ruby-chronic 0.6.7-1, ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-1, ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1, ruby-trollop 1.16.2-1, sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1
- Previous by thread:
Re: RFS: ruby-chronic 0.6.7-1, ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-1, ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1, ruby-trollop 1.16.2-1, sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1
- Next by thread:
Re: RFS: ruby-chronic 0.6.7-1, ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-1, ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1, ruby-trollop 1.16.2-1, sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1
- Index(es):