On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:47:48PM +0530, Praveen A wrote: > 2011/9/22 Cédric Boutillier <cedric.boutillier@gmail.com>: > > Thank you very much for reviewing the package. I implemented your comments. > Is /usr/bin/testrb exactly same as the one that comes with ruby? Well spotted, thank you, that is something I overlooked. That is exactly the same code as testrb1.8 (but not testrb1.9.1!). Running testrb1.8 with ruby-test-unit installed works exactly like bin/testrb, as all the work is done by code is in test/unit. It has some more options that are not described in testrb1.8 manpage. One possibility would be to ship bin/testrb, and divert testrb1.8 and testrb1.9 (and their manpages) to make them point to the new testrb, but I wonder if that is not too much burden for a 4 line-long script... What do you think? Or I could mention in a README.Debian that one may expect some changes in the behavior of testrb1.8 (more options, could be run with ruby1.9.1) and testrb1.9.1 (not working) when ruby-test-unit is installed. Best regards, Cédric
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature