Re: RFS: ruby-mocha

[Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>]

On 03/04/11 at 14:24 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
> > I think that the only correct Debian way to ensure clean upgrades is to
> > provide transition packages, unfortunately. Of course, we should also
> > ensure that r-deps use the ruby-foo packages, but there are many ruby
> > packages that have no r-deps, or that are often used without r-deps.
> > 
> > The good thing is that the transitional packages can go away as soon as
> > wheezy is released...
> 
> ok, let's go there then. For what I understood from
> http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package, using transitional packages
> has the advantage that the old source package is removed automatically.
> Is that correct?
> 
> We still need to update the tracking UDD scripts to ignore the
> transitional packages in migrated packages.
> 
> I've just updated ruby-mocha adding the transitional packages. I've
> tested the upgrade and it works fine. Can you please upload it?

Hi,

Uploaded.
I've reverted your debian/rules hack and used debian/ruby-tests.rb
instead.

Thanks!

- Lucas