[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: introducing a ruby-common package, with update-ruby-alternatives tool

Hi Lucas,

Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
> > I wrote update-ruby-alternatives, and the solution I came up with was to
> > add it to a new package called ruby-common, which the actualy
> > interpreter packages (ruby1.8, ruby1.9.1 etc) should depend on.
> > 
> > The code for this is ready in the `update-ruby-alternatives` branch on
> > the ruby-defaults git repository, would you  have a look at it and tell
> > us what you think? Do you guys agree with that implementation?
> Hi Antonio,
> I reviewed the ruby-common package, and it sounds very good to me.  The
> only comment is that it should probably be a separate ruby-common source
> package (ruby-defaults contains only transitional packages at this
> point).
> Another option would be to call it "ruby-switcher" or "ruby-switch".
> What do you think?

I think these are very sensible suggestions, thank you. I've worked on
this today and we have a first version of the ruby-switch package:


Feedback is welcome.  I will probably upload it sometime during next

I also thought better and figured out that making the interpreter
packages depend on it is too much, so I think ruby-switch is going to be
a regular, optional package.

Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: