[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ruby-bluecloth



Hi Augusto!

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:05:40AM -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:

> IMO it's better to keep the manpage in pod format in the source package
> and generate the .1 file during package build, and remove it when
> cleaning, than storing troff code in the repository since that is pretty
> much gibberish for normal people.  :-)

> When I convert existing packages I usually keep the original maintainers
> as uploaders together with me, I don't known what others think about
> that but I think this is a good thing to do.

> lintian reports a spelling error in the manpage text, you could fix
> that.

Thank you for your comments.

I followed your recommendations. I also added two patches to remove rubygems
requirements and $LOAD_PATH modifications in the tests, which are still
deactivated, waiting for depencies.

In the mean time, I think I slightly messed up with the git history. Sorry for
that :(

What do you think of the state of the package now?

Best regards,

	Cédric

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: