Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > On 10/03/11 at 11:47 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 09/03/11 at 22:27 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Ruby changes for Wheezy"): > > > > We are planning a rather large set of changes in Ruby packaging for > > > > Debian wheezy, and would appreciate some external feedback on our > > > > proposals. > > > > > > > > Our plans are described on > > > > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyInWheezy > > > > Don't hesitate to ask for details if needed. > > > > > > I think your families of packages > > > ruby1.8-foo > > > ruby1.9.1-foo > > > ruby-foo-common > > > etc. are overcomplicated. Can you not find a way to make only one > > > package for each extension, each containing an appropriate collection > > > of .so files etc. ? > > > > what we could do, indeed, is ship all the .so files in the same binary > > package, and then hack the Depends field to have: > > ruby1.8 | ruby-interpreter > > > > What is the correct way to override what dpkg-shlibdeps detects? > > (Dropping -devel@ from Cc) > > So, what do you think about that? > Shipping everything in the same binary package makes things noticeably > simpler. I'm willing to go in that direction if you agree. I agree as well. I wanted to make a summary of the points raised on -devel, but hadn't the time for that yet. Anyone? -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@softwarelivre.org> http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature