Re: pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@ -> debian-ruby@?
Vincent Fourmond dijo [Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:23:22PM +0200]:
> Hmmm. No. Unless I completely misunderstood Lucas's post (which is
> very possible, I have basic understanding problems ;-)...), what Lucas
> proposes is to drop pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers altogether. To this I
> strongly object.
>
> See the quotation from <20090729082834.GC28178@xanadu.blop.info>
>
> Lucas's initial proposition:
> > The ruby-extras team currently uses pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers as
> > Maintainer: or Uploaders:. I find it annoying to have two Debian/Ruby
> > lists, which often requires adding Ccs between the list.
> >
> > I think that we should switch to using only debian-ruby@ for everything
> > except commit logs (which go to pkg-ruby-extras-commits@). This matches
> > what the perl team does, and it seems to be totally bearable even for
> > bigger teams.
>
> Unless I'm very wrong, that means dropping pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
> ? Could you clarify, please, Lucas, if you're around ?
That would be terribly burdensome(?), to say the least. It is the main
maintainer contact address for most of our packages. However, moving
all human discussion to one cleaner, easily followable list
(debian-ruby) and leaving machine-generated mails on the other is a
clear win for me. Of course, I will set some filters up to pick up
anything not coming from the usual suspects (DEHS, Dak et al) in _my_
copy of the lists from pkg-ruby-extras-blah to the human one because,
as you say, users might write directly to it. But for _archival_ and
discussion purposes, it's best.
--
Gunnar Wolf • gwolf@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
Reply to: