Hi, On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:58:12PM +0300, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: > Aurélien, what is your impression ruby-postgres upstream? According to > RubyForge, it appears to be dead since about 2 years ago... If it > truly is so, probably we should change description of libpgsql-ruby to > recommend ruby-pg? It is indeed dead upstream. I even refrained to upload the latest snapshot (with notices support), because it appeared as a reverse-dependency of rails, and I never had a use case for it with rails. I used libdbi-ruby1.8 with rails. I adopted it back then, because I used it for personal admin scripts. There is also libdbd-pg-ruby1.8 as reverse-dependency. I would go for a total replacement, as this fork is what seems to be used nowadays. Since I do not have the time to investigate, this is why I said that you can do whatever it takes to move on, so feel free to add you as co-maintainer. Cheers, -- .''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME : :' : `. `'` Debian Maintainer `- Unix Sys & Net Admin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature