Hi Yamada-san, On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:52:32AM +0900, akira yamada wrote: > I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian. > In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to > /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux. > ref: > - <URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.html> > - <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315566> > New $LOAD_PATH is: > /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89] > /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux > /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux > /usr/local/lib/site_ruby > /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89] > /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux > /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux > . > "/usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux" and > "/usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux" is temporally added for transition. > I will remove them at one or two month later. If you drop them from the path, what is your plan for ensuring that partial upgrades from sarge to etch don't cause broken systems? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature