rdoc is included in ruby-defaults now
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 23:14:46 +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:10:04PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > Is there still a point to keeping the rdoc package around? It looks like
> > it depends on Ruby 1.8, so it's equivalent to the rdoc1.8 package. If
> > this is the case, I would suggest just removing rdoc and maybe renaming
> > rdoc1.8 to rdoc.
>
> Well as I exspect ri to drag ri1.8 along, and ruby ruby1.8 because it's
> just the current version, I was already confused that there was not
> an rdoc virtual package.
>
> So I would suggest to make this the same as all other ruby related
> binary packages. A rdoc dummy package depending on rdoc1.8.
> I believe this isn't mentioned in the Ruby Policy though, only for
> modules.
It looks like this is accomplished in version 1.8.1-7 of ruby-defaults,
which entered unstable on May, 22. In the meantime, that version of
ruby-defaults has gone into testing, therefore I'm closing this bug.
If anybody feels this is inappropriate, please do not hesitate to reopen it
again.
Cheers,
- --
Tobias
Bigamy is having one spouse too many. Monogamy is the same.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA0Ew+CqqEJ0Fs8twRAtNzAJkB/urNtnXRsfQPj2r3dna/Q6NwHACeIIUq
p5rItYeYx6lM43TqGOop8Ww=
=BooC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: