[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: texlive-bin: test builds on your architectures

On 25.09.2023 14:43, Bo YU wrote:

Hi,


Sorry for late reply.


I'm happy to get a reply at all and not have to test myself.



On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:51:38PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:

Dear porters,
the CPU support of luajit has extended in the last years (see [1]), hence I'd like to know if the package texlive-binaries-sse2 can be built on arm64, mips64el and riscv64. Unfortunately I don't have all CPU's available to test a build. Would you be so kind to do the task for me?
Simply download the source package of texlive-bin, unpack it and append your arch to the line containing "amd64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 powerpc" in d/rules and d/control; then rebuild. The build executes some kind of test suite at the end. 

I did this as your hint but unfortunately it fail to build. The log is
here[0] and debdiff is attached.

```
...
checking for _LARGEFILE_SOURCE value needed for large files... (cached) no
checking how to run the C preprocessor... (cached) gcc -E
configure: error: Sorry, can not preprocess <lj_arch.h>
=== configuring in luajit failed
make[3]: *** [Makefile:868: recurse] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/Work/libs'
make[2]: *** [Makefile:439: all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/Work/libs'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:534: all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/Work'
dh_auto_build: error: cd Work && make -j4 returned exit code 2
make: *** [debian/rules:69: binary] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Build finished at 2023-09-25T11:29:20Z

```

For luajit on Debian riscv64, I opened a issue[1] some time ago and hope
this helps.

Please let me know if any issues.
Many thanks for testing, even if you have known in advance, that it would not work. I had a look at the luajit bug tracker [2], seems that anybody is working on a port. Please mark #1034484 as forwarded if it is the same issue / request. 

Hilmar
[0]: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vohK1uHAsYJJheh6s2l_FY_HH_fn1FpS/view?usp=sharing 
[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034484



[2] https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues?q=risc

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: