Re: rv-manda-01 might have hardware issues?
Hi,
On 2023-08-03 11:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-08-03 10:49, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:08:18PM +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 17:32, Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > This happens only on rv-manda-01, and my guess would be that this might
> > > > be a hardware problem (e.g. a nonworking fan).
> > > >
> > > > Much worse than the build failures is that I wouldn't 100% trust that
> > > > the contents of successful builds is not corrupted.
> > >
> > > Ack, will stop it for the moment, thanks.
> >
> > rv-manda-01 is running again, 2 questions:
> >
> > 1. Is rv-manda-01 now stable?
> >
> > The problem seems to have gone so far, has anything be fixed
> > (or was it rebooted and that was sufficient)?
>
> It got rebooted to a new kernel, but that was unrelated.
>
> > 2. Rebuild of potentially broken packages.
> >
> > I would like to do "Rebuild on non-flaky buildd" binNMUs of the
> > 984 packages that were built on rv-manda-01 before my previous
> > email, because these packages cannot be trusted.[1]
>
> As said in my previous mail, I don't think there is any hardware issue
> with rv-manda-01. Or if there is, it's affecting all buildds. Therefore
> please do not schedule those binNMUs.
>
> > Example:
> >
> > iraf-mscred and iraf-fitsutil do FTBFS with weird errors on several
> > buildds, after looking at the iraf-fitsutil error my first suspect
> > would be that cfitsio was built on rv-manda-01.
>
> I have been able to reproduce the issue locally, and it happens with
> both cfitsio from the debian archive and the debian-ports archive.
The problem is reproducible on amd64 and seems to be related to iraf
2.17.1. Reported as #1042956 and #1042957.
Cheers
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
Reply to: