Re: The brief status of Debian riscv porting --2023/01/08
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:21 PM Umit Sami <umit.sami@memcus.com> wrote:
>
> I meant to say eBPF !
I just tested eBPF demo with libbpf-bootstrap[0] but unfortunately,
the demo can not be run due to kernel config
does not support BTF maybe:
```
rv@unmatched:~/git/libbpf-bootstrap/examples/c$ sudo ./bootstrap
[sudo] password for rv:
libbpf: failed to get EHDR from /boot/vmlinux-6.3.0-1-riscv64
libbpf: failed to find valid kernel BTF
libbpf: Error loading vmlinux BTF: -3
libbpf: failed to load object 'bootstrap_bpf'
libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'bootstrap_bpf': -3
Failed to load and verify BPF skeleton
```
I have submitted the MR[1] and let's see how it goes.
BR,
Bo
[0]: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf-bootstrap
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/755
>
> ------------------------
> Umit D. Sami
> Founder and CEO - Memcus Inc.
>
> Cell: (857) 472-0480
> Email: umit.sami@memcus.com
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:19 AM Umit Sami <umit.sami@memcus.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a question. Is it possible to run an eBFP application inside Linux Kernel for RISC-V architectures at this point in time or is it still a work in progress?
>>
>> Umit
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------
>> Umit D. Sami
>> Founder and CEO - Memcus Inc.
>>
>> Cell: (857) 472-0480
>> Email: umit.sami@memcus.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 10:17 AM Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is the first issue of status with Debian riscv64 porting of the
>>> new year. With less than a week[0] to go, The freeze for bookworm
>>> will happen. So anyway from now let's look forward to the release of
>>> bookworm.
>>>
>>> Debian riscv64 arch did not catch up with the release of bookworm in
>>> my view. But we're so close to achieve the goal. Many thanks to
>>> everyone involved in this process. Without their participation, this
>>> achievement would not have been possible.
>>>
>>> In 2023, we should have several powerful boards(kernel upstream
>>> supported) that can be used as buildd machines. This will make it
>>> easier for us to meet Debian official porting requirements.
>>>
>>> After several waves of rebuilding[1] for some packages that have not
>>> built for a long time, There's not a lot of FTBFS on riscv64 packages
>>> was added here. Another important thing from my view is to help
>>> nodejs[2] that can be built on riscv64 as soon as possible. This
>>> caused some dependency issues for debci[3].
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Bo
>>>
>>> [0]: https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html
>>> [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=riscv64&suite=sid
>>> [2]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=nodejs&arch=riscv64
>>> [3]: https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/node-esrecurse/unstable/riscv64/
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Bo YU
>>>
Reply to: