Re: Bug#1012849: efitools: ftbfs on riscv64

[Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>]

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:57:15PM +0800, xiao sheng wen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>在 2022/6/15 23:21, Steve McIntyre 写道:
>> Control: severity -1 wishlist
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:02:50PM +0800, xiao sheng wen wrote:
>> > Control: Severity -1  important
>> Please don't raise severity on packages asking for support for a
>> non-release architecture.
>
>FTBFS bug is a RC bug in release architecture,
>as riscv is a non-release architecture, so downgrade these FTBFS bugs to Severity: important,

There's a difference between "FTBFS on this ports architecture" (but
previously built OK) and "has never built on this ports architecture".

I'm not saying I'm going to look at the bug report and patch here, but
please don't inflate severity.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
"You can't barbecue lettuce!" -- Ellie Crane