On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 08:22:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, 2022-06-04 at 16:58 +0800, Bo YU wrote:Those riscv64 hardware machines for buildd must be shiped to Debian hosting locations? If so, could you offer more info about it? And how about portbox also? Poerbox should be controled by DSA.Yes, the buildds and porterboxen for the official ports usually need to be shipped to existing Debian hosting locations. This isn't a hard requirement, for some ports DSA had additional port-specific hosting locations added, but that wasn't always a great experience due to various deficiencies (no public IPs, no IPv4, no IPv6, firewall issues) and having to deal with additional hosting providers. These pages list the official DSA hardware/network policy: https://dsa.debian.org/ports/hardware-requirements/ https://dsa.debian.org/doc/firewall/At first I thought it was the same way for debci team reomte accessing those riscv64 machines via stable network. These infos are what the sponsor expressly wants to know.All debci worker machines are not in debian.org and so they aren't administered by DSA, so the requirements are different for them.
Ok, good to know these fact. Thank you, pabs. Bo
-- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-- Best Regards,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature