[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1000196: marked as done (reportbug-gtk: incomplete and thus wrong message after sending re-opend tmp file)



Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 22:48:10 +0100
with message-id <74c9d933-2772-0fea-6652-8ea917e8ef1c@web.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#1000196: reportbug-gtk: incomplete and thus wrong message after sending re-opend tmp file
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000196,
regarding reportbug-gtk: incomplete and thus wrong message after sending re-opend tmp file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1000196: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000196
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-gtk
Version: 11.1.0
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?

Due to SMTP overload reportbug saved the report to a tmp file.

Sending the report based on the re-opened tmp file resulted in a message along
the lines: "bug report written to tmp file etc ...", but nothing about "file
successfully sent". This gives you the impression, the file was *not* sent. So
I re-tried until the SMTP answer stopped me ....

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
Please give a informative feedback (file successfully sent and written to....)



-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.15.2-4-siduction-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages reportbug-gtk depends on:
ii  gir1.2-gtk-3.0         3.24.30-3
ii  gir1.2-gtksource-4     4.8.2-1
ii  gir1.2-vte-2.91        0.66.1-1
ii  python3-gi             3.42.0-2
ii  python3-gi-cairo       3.42.0-2
ii  python3-gtkspellcheck  4.0.5-2
ii  reportbug              11.1.0

reportbug-gtk recommends no packages.

reportbug-gtk suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 20.11.2021 12.55, nis.martensen@web.de wrote:
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> Michael Hatzold hat am 19.11.2021 geschrieben:
>> Due to SMTP overload reportbug saved the report to a tmp file.
>>
>> Sending the report based on the re-opened tmp file resulted in a message along
>> the lines: "bug report written to tmp file etc ...", but nothing about "file
>> successfully sent". This gives you the impression, the file was *not* sent. So
>> I re-tried until the SMTP answer stopped me ....
>>
>>    * What outcome did you expect instead?
>> Please give a informative feedback (file successfully sent and written to....)
> 
> Please provide the necessary information that could allow us to understand and reproduce the bug:
>  - What is your reportbug configuration?
>  - How did you invoke reportbug? (complete and exact command line, please)
>  - Does the problem also occur if you use the text interface? Or are you saying this is a specific problem with the GTK interface?
>  - How did you check whether the mail was sent? What do you mean by "SMTP answer stopped me"?
> 
> Since the build-in report submission support provides only basic functionality, you might want to look into reportbug's MUA integration feature for a better user experience.

Closing since no additional information has been provided.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: