Hello, On Sat 22 Jan 2022 at 09:21PM -05, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Hey Paul, > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 8:45 PM Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Package: reportbug >> Version: 11.2.0 >> Severity: wishlist >> X-Debbugs-CC: ftp.debian.org@packages.debian.org >> Control: affects -1 ftp.debian.org@packages.debian.org >> >> When filing bugs against ftp.debian.org there is a menu >> asking what kind of request the bug report is about: >> >> 1 ANAIS Package removal - Architecture Not Allowed In Source. >> 2 ICE Package removal - Internal Compiler Error. >> 3 NBS Package removal - Not Built [by] Source. >> 4 NPOASR Package removal - Never Part Of A Stable Release. >> 5 NVIU Package removal - Newer Version In Unstable. >> 6 ROM Package removal - Request Of Maintainer. >> 7 ROP Package removal - Request of Porter. >> 8 RoQA Package removal - Requested by the QA team. >> 9 other Not a package removal request, report other problems. >> 10 override Change override request. >> >> Currently reportbug doesn't add removal usertags, which means people >> try to do it and then often they get it wrong, many use rm or removal >> instead of remove for example or make typos like remvoe or similar. >> >> Please add these usertags for Package removal requests: >> >> User: ftp.debian.org@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: remove > > no disrespect, according to https://ftp-master.debian.org/ you are not > part of the FTP master team; we would really like the input from that > team (CC'ed) on how to structure this: after all, these packages are > coded for their consumption, and we should do what makes their work > easier. I don't believe any of our scripts for removals care about usertags, just bug subjects, so it seems fine to trust the existing tags the BTS knows about, as demonstrated by Paul's rsync commands. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature