[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#994221: marked as done (reportbug: for release.debian.org rm bugs, ask for suite and redirect to ftp.debian.org for unstable/experimental)

Your message dated Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:18:43 +0000
with message-id <E1mcXDf-00022k-9e@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#994221: fixed in reportbug 11.1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #994221,
regarding reportbug: for release.debian.org rm bugs, ask for suite and redirect to ftp.debian.org for unstable/experimental
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
994221: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994221
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: reportbug
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 + release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org

Removals from unstable regularly end up being filed against the
release.debian.org psuedo-package (#994195 is the latest example).

It would be useful to have those redirected to the right psuedo-package
ftp.debian.org. For release.debian.org rm requests, please ask for
which suite the removal is for (as is done for ftp.debian.org removals)
and if it is for unstable/experimental then redirect the request to the
ftp.debian.org psuedo-package (as is done in the other direction for
ftp.debian.org removals for the testing suite).

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: reportbug
Source-Version: 11.1.0
Done: Nis Martensen <nis.martensen@web.de>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
reportbug, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 994221@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nis Martensen <nis.martensen@web.de> (supplier of updated reportbug package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:45:55 +0200
Source: reportbug
Architecture: source
Version: 11.1.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reportbug Maintainers <debian-reportbug@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Nis Martensen <nis.martensen@web.de>
Closes: 431402 599290 721212 873493 984904 985727 994221 996654
Changes:
 reportbug (11.1.0) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Nelson A. de Oliveira ]
   * reportbug/submit.py: include temp filename in resume message
     (Closes: #985727)
 .
   [ Nis Martensen ]
   * checkversions.get_versions_available(): distinguish src and bin pkg versions
     (Closes: #873493)
   * reportbug/utils.py: add get_source_version()
   * bin/reportbug: improve version lookup for source packages (Closes: #984904)
   * man/reportbug.1: add hint about "src:" prefix
   * reportbug/utils.py: print apt error in get_source_version()
   * reportbug.utils.get_source_package: switch to python apt
   * reportbug.utils.get_source_package: also return source package
   * reportbug.utils.get_source_package: add option to match only src packages
   * test/test_utils.py: update and extend test for get_source_package
   * bin/reportbug: adapt to new version of utils.get_source_package
   * bin/reportbug: Do not ask for nonexistent packages (Closes: #431402)
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: try apt-cache after dpkg to get package info
     (Closes: #599290, #721212)
   * reportbug/utils.py: use dpkg-query instead of dpkg-internal database files
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: direct rm requests to the right pseudo-package
     (Closes: #994221)
   * reportbug/ui/gtk_ui.py: switch from spawn_sync to spawn_async
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: replace menu by yes/no question
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: drop unused msgfactory and parse_mbox_report
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: drop broken parse_html_report()
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: remove old fallback code
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: more broken code removal
   * test/test_debbugs.py: add tests for handle_* functions
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: drop unused imports
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: pep8 fixes
   * reportbug/ui/gtk_ui.py: recognize system information as "other info"
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: do not mention sarge release (Closes: #996654)
   * Gtk UI: switch from gtksourceview3 to gtksourceview4
Checksums-Sha1:
 830d3b684a12ef5d7ca12967d0839078a9a4c41c 1888 reportbug_11.1.0.dsc
 96f9ab1d1ae0abc0b2c4f4b63d5e77837b5357d3 204312 reportbug_11.1.0.tar.xz
 c6ae874b8be64c3f35b2aa912abd60b68c592d12 7497 reportbug_11.1.0_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 16ed21f92b6a1baff78fc18ed07364a21a1ba6ebb17eae5cc718ba4e470e23dd 1888 reportbug_11.1.0.dsc
 ef8af667cb4fb9b9fe3ccf759d5ce59da4cb078d57990f0effa76607c756662b 204312 reportbug_11.1.0.tar.xz
 c44e4356a0f53d210f955810af298104c13e98b896b826ebbe1dcfe7c093a15e 7497 reportbug_11.1.0_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 30d62da50a441b087ab7e98995ce788d 1888 utils standard reportbug_11.1.0.dsc
 020be0bc529d6e45c9d225fc43271e4b 204312 utils standard reportbug_11.1.0.tar.xz
 83e8b68debb3ca5a31b2140fded6a901 7497 utils standard reportbug_11.1.0_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=+jgz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: