[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#704824: marked as done (reportbug: submitting a followup to a "templated" bug should not ask the questions again)



Your message dated Sun, 3 Jan 2021 14:08:24 +0100
with message-id <f2356e97-23f4-9ae3-7d1b-37a7e2bd1ad5@web.de>
and subject line Re: reportbug: submitting a followup to a "templated" bug should not ask the questions again
has caused the Debian Bug report #704824,
regarding reportbug: submitting a followup to a "templated" bug should not ask the questions again
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
704824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704824
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.4.4
Severity: normal

Hi,

using reportbug to post a followup on a "templated bug", e.g. an unblock
bug on the release.debian.org pseudo package should not ask the template
questions again.

One reason for replying is e.g. to retitle a pre-approval to an unblock,
attach a new debdiff, ...


Andreas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 7.7.0

On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> 
> using reportbug to post a followup on a "templated bug", e.g. an unblock
> bug on the release.debian.org pseudo package should not ask the template
> questions again.
> 
> One reason for replying is e.g. to retitle a pre-approval to an unblock,
> attach a new debdiff, ...

I think this is the same as your other bug that was fixed in
https://salsa.debian.org/reportbug-team/reportbug/-/commit/b943b7b71960ecae8c73b639f9c3427c63be9598

--- End Message ---

Reply to: