[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1002807: marked as done (reportbug: Linux Debian AMD64 5.10.84-1: I/O Scheduler DEADLINE w/ Bad I/O Performance After Installation)



Your message dated Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:40:19 -0500
with message-id <CAB4XWXzj4XtC9Mju+RxoTEuNNF38JHtP5bVQn3vXBtb556WMCg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1002807: reportbug: Linux Debian AMD64 5.10.84-1: I/O Scheduler DEADLINE w/ Bad I/O Performance After Installation
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002807,
regarding reportbug: Linux Debian AMD64 5.10.84-1: I/O Scheduler DEADLINE w/ Bad I/O Performance After Installation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1002807: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002807
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 7.10.3+deb11u1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: jeffredbeard7@gmail.com

1) I prepared a USB flash drive with the newest net installation image (dd
if=/image.iso of=/dev/drive)
2) I restarted the physical (non-virtualized) computer and installed the
system. I noticed, I have not proof but I think, it took way longer than it
should have even from a USB 2.0 interface. By the way, the drive is a 3.0.
3) The system was near unusable. Any ordinary user would have not been able to
use the system.
4) I noticed the disk cache (using command line utility top) was not utilizing
hardly any memory.
5) I went under /sys/ and found the IO scheduler for the block devices was
DEADLINE. It only showed DEADLINE and NOP.
6) I think it might should have CFQ. I'm not an expert on this area.
7) I tweaked the tunables so writes had a 30 second goal and reads had a 5
second goal. I might have tweaked another parameter or two.
8) The system regained about 80% of the performance I would expect. I still
don't think it is running as well as it could.

Without the fixes the system would be a severe problem for any user to the
point they would not utilize the system.

Thank you for making such a great distribution!!! I have always used Debian. So
sorry for reporting the bug!


-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
INTERFACE="gtk"

** /home/kmcguire/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "7.10.3+deb11u1"
mode novice
ui gtk
realname "jeff"
email "jeffredbeard7@gmail.com"
no-cc
list-cc-me
smtphost reportbug.debian.org

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-10-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii  apt                2.2.4
ii  python3            3.9.2-3
ii  python3-reportbug  7.10.3+deb11u1
ii  sensible-utils     0.0.14

reportbug recommends no packages.

Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
pn  claws-mail                                            <none>
pn  debconf-utils                                         <none>
pn  debsums                                               <none>
pn  default-mta | postfix | exim4 | mail-transport-agent  <none>
pn  dlocate                                               <none>
pn  emacs-bin-common                                      <none>
ii  file                                                  1:5.39-3
ii  gnupg                                                 2.2.27-2
pn  python3-urwid                                         <none>
pn  reportbug-gtk                                         <none>
ii  xdg-utils                                             1.1.3-4.1

Versions of packages python3-reportbug depends on:
ii  apt                2.2.4
ii  file               1:5.39-3
ii  python3            3.9.2-3
ii  python3-apt        2.2.1
ii  python3-debian     0.1.39
ii  python3-debianbts  3.1.0
ii  python3-requests   2.25.1+dfsg-2
ii  sensible-utils     0.0.14

python3-reportbug suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:33 AM jeff <jeffredbeard7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Package: reportbug
> Version: 7.10.3+deb11u1
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: jeffredbeard7@gmail.com
>
> 1) I prepared a USB flash drive with the newest net installation image (dd
> if=/image.iso of=/dev/drive)

this is not the right places to submit this report; please seek
support on one of the support channels at
https://www.debian.org/support

-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi

--- End Message ---

Reply to: