Bug#1099188: remmina: crash remmina when i close one of my remote window from tab bar
Package: remmina
Version: 1.4.39+dfsg-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: alirezaimi@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
nothing! just open multiple remote and close one of them .
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
nothing .
* What was the outcome of this action?
nothing.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
close on tab and other tabs continue working .
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.12.12-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_USER, TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages remmina depends on:
ii dbus-user-session [default-dbus-session-bus] 1.16.0-1
ii libavahi-client3 0.8-16
ii libavahi-common3 0.8-16
ii libavahi-ui-gtk3-0 0.8-16
ii libayatana-appindicator3-1 0.5.93+really-3
ii libc6 2.40-7
ii libcairo2 1.18.2-2
ii libcurl4t64 8.12.1-2
ii libgcrypt20 1.11.0-7
ii libglib2.0-0t64 2.83.3-2
ii libgtk-3-0t64 3.24.48-4
ii libjson-glib-1.0-0 1.10.6+ds-1
ii libpango-1.0-0 1.56.1-1
ii libsodium23 1.0.18-1+b2
ii libssh-4 0.11.1-1
ii libssl3t64 3.4.1-1
ii libvte-2.91-0 0.79.90-2
ii remmina-common 1.4.39+dfsg-1
Versions of packages remmina recommends:
ii remmina-plugin-rdp 1.4.39+dfsg-1
ii remmina-plugin-secret 1.4.39+dfsg-1
ii remmina-plugin-vnc 1.4.39+dfsg-1
Versions of packages remmina suggests:
pn remmina-plugin-exec <none>
pn remmina-plugin-kwallet <none>
pn remmina-plugin-python <none>
pn remmina-plugin-spice <none>
pn remmina-plugin-www <none>
pn remmina-plugin-x2go <none>
-- no debconf information
Reply to: