[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1092112: marked as done (remmina-plugin-spice: Debian website says it's available. Aptitude says otherwise.)

Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2025 21:17:45 +0100
with message-id <10a7059aed78391a4985976d596f215a7e56eb15.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1092112: remmina-plugin-spice: Debian website says it's available. Aptitude says otherwise.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092112,
regarding remmina-plugin-spice: Debian website says it's available. Aptitude says otherwise.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1092112: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092112
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: remmina-plugin-spice
Version: 1.3.3+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: johndoetoe@protonmail.ch

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
Remmina is supposed to support the Spice protocol (e.g. to connect to QEMU VMs)

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
apt install remmina-plugin-spice fails
aptitude search remmina does not find it

Debian 12 Stable

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

It would install or remmina would be deprecated in Debian

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.8
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'bookworm-fasttrack'), (100, 'bookworm-backports-staging')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, 2025-01-04 at 19:08 +0000, JDT wrote:
> Hi Sven,
> 
> Thanks for the clarification. I'll double-back and figure out how I
> miss-read the pages. I'll look at other options.

Closing this bug as no fix is needed.

-- 
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: