Re: CMake 4 upload to unstable
Hi Timo
On 2026-01-13 10:24:53 +0100, Timo Röhling wrote:
> it's been quite a while, and people have started to lower the severity of
> the CMake 4 bugs again because of the long delay. Can we please go ahead
> with the CMake 4 upload?
Indeed, I have raised the bugs back to serious.
Please go ahead with the upload of cmake 4 to unstable.
Cheers
>
> Cheers
> Timo
>
> * Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> [2025-12-03 15:11]:
> > Hi Emilio,
> >
> > * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> [2025-12-03 13:29]:
> > > The llvm bugs worry me a little bit. Other than that, this would be
> > > good to go.
> > I have looked into the issue and shared my findings [1]. If the bug is
> > not as easy to resolve as I currently think it is, I also offered to
> > upload a cmake-3 legacy package as a temporary band-aid, but I have not
> > heard back from the LLVM maintainers yet.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > Timo
> >
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1113237#35
> >
> > The root cause is the support for WebAssembly targets. WebAssembly does
> > not support shared libraries; older CMake releases just issued a warning
> > and built static libraries instead, but this is no longer the case. LLVM
> > upstream said the shared library build for runtime libs is not the
> > default, so this must have been enabled somewhere in the Debian
> > packaging. I could not figure out where, but I would assume the actual
> > maintainers can.
> >
> > --
> > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
> > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │
> > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
> > ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
>
>
>
> --
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: