[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#145257: marked as done ([britney] migrations can break build-depends)



Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2026 21:33:48 +0100
with message-id <389f8398-bcc6-4ec2-8b0c-58a030acbd98@debian.org>
and subject line Re: #145257 Re: [britney] migrations can break build-depends
has caused the Debian Bug report #145257,
regarding [britney] migrations can break build-depends
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
145257: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=145257
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rumba-utils
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: woody

This package has a build dependency on librumbabase-dev (>= 1.0.1)
that can't be fulfilled inside woody.

This is a bad thing in a technical sense (it's e.g. impossible to
make security updates for this package) and it might even violate
the copyright of this pacakge.


BTW: It wouldn't have made sense to send this bug report before the
     final "normal" testing run of woody because before it would have
     been possible at any day that the build dependency might be
     automatically fulfilled.

BTW2: A list of packages with broken build dependencies is always
      available at the Debian QA pages [1].


[1] http://qa.debian.org






--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On 1/4/26 16:43, Paul Gevers wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what's special about that situation.


It turns out that there was a flaw in the original code. It would fail to block migration if the to-be-broken package in the target suite was already fixed in the source suite. I have fixed that in commit 9843775 and now I consider this bug done.

Paul
PS: deployment is pending, probably tomorrow

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: