Your message dated Wed, 31 Dec 2025 13:02:08 +0100 with message-id <aVUQwPBO794VNR1i@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#1123577: nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64 has caused the Debian Bug report #1123577, regarding nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1123577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1123577 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64
- From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:17:17 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] aUPivdd1NzI5MA1Q@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: mesa@packages.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, debian-riscv@lists.debian.org, debian-s390@lists.debian.org, debian-ports@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:mesa User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 armhf User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org Usertags: i386 User: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el User: debian-riscv@lists.debian.org Usertags: riscv64 User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org Usertags: s390x User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu mesa was binNMU'd as +b3 on amd64 but +b2 on all the other release architectures, resulting in multiarch skew that makes packages like Wine and Steam uninstallable. Anyone doing cross-compiling will probably want the non-x86 architectures to be co-installable, too. I think this is right: nmu mesa_25.2.8-2 . ANY -amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild to sync binNMU versions" but if there's a syntax for explicitly requesting +b3, that would be safer. -ports, if someone can trigger a +b3 build on the ports that are keeping up, that would probably also be helpful: hppa loong64 m68k powerpc sh4 sparc64 x32 (alpha and hurd-* are BD-Uninstallable, and ppc64 FTBFS, so not much point for those) smcv
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Tobias Frost <tobi@sviech.de>, 1123577-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1123577: nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 13:02:08 +0100
- Message-id: <aVUQwPBO794VNR1i@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 32212ae2f61b3b9c29507abb1bdbf75474ff7a55.camel@sviech.de>
- References: <[🔎] aUPivdd1NzI5MA1Q@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk> <f023a080-5a69-44a4-a45c-6d3140ec47a7@debian.org> <[🔎] aUPivdd1NzI5MA1Q@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk> <[🔎] 32212ae2f61b3b9c29507abb1bdbf75474ff7a55.camel@sviech.de>
On 2025-12-31 10:37:50 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > > > It seems the mismatch is still there: > > > > apt-cache show libgbm1:i386/testing > Package: libgbm1 > Source: mesa (25.2.8-2) > Version: 25.2.8-2+b2 > > apt-cache show libgbm1/testing > Package: libgbm1 > Source: mesa (25.2.8-2) > Version: 25.2.8-2+b3 mesa is waiting to migrate. Closing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---