[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Bug#1111475: release.debian.org: glib2.0 "Rejected due to piuparts regression" but no obvious regression
To
: Paul Gevers <
elbrus@debian.org
>,
1111475@bugs.debian.org
Cc
: Simon McVittie <
smcv@debian.org
>
Subject
: Bug#1111475: release.debian.org: glib2.0 "Rejected due to piuparts regression" but no obvious regression
From
: Jeremy Bícha <
jbicha@debian.org
>
Date
: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:37:44 -0500
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
CAAajCMZaHdUT+z4_r08QUf581m7m1U9onA+t++aa4yTcwmCPJQ@mail.gmail.com
>
Reply-to
: Jeremy Bícha <
jbicha@debian.org
>,
1111475@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to
: <CAAajCMZvcbVOwwpFTAUbZVPF5LE41=e08YVws7zXqNa0jEiz9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References
: <aKMY_kZNUSjhlgHW@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk> <0df9af95-1c78-4960-9879-05e7457e691e@debian.org> <CAAajCMaay9M6VwQDZYMs8iHdx+oarWz0E9s3YT-DVZyN-egt3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAajCMZvcbVOwwpFTAUbZVPF5LE41=e08YVws7zXqNa0jEiz9Q@mail.gmail.com> <aKMY_kZNUSjhlgHW@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk>
glib2.0 is stuck again:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=glib2.0
Thank you, Jeremy Bícha
Reply to:
debian-release@lists.debian.org
Jeremy Bícha (on-list)
Jeremy Bícha (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Bug#1111475: release.debian.org: glib2.0 "Rejected due to piuparts regression" but no obvious regression
From:
Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
Prev by Date:
Bug#993079: release.debian.org: autopkgtest scheduling does not seem to understand virtual packages correctly.
Next by Date:
Processed: Re: Bug#1120848: trixie-pu: package clatd/2.1.0-2+deb13u1
Previous by thread:
Bug#1117650: 1117650: autoremoval should be smarter about (versioned) Provides
Next by thread:
Bug#1111475: release.debian.org: glib2.0 "Rejected due to piuparts regression" but no obvious regression
Index(es):
Date
Thread