Bug#1111475: release.debian.org: glib2.0 "Rejected due to piuparts regression" but no obvious regression

[Jeremy Bícha <jbicha@debian.org>]

Control: affects -1 src:glib2.0

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 6:26 AM Jeremy Bicha <jeremy@bicha.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 2:03 PM Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 18-08-2025 14:13, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=glib2.0 says, among other
> > > things:
> > >
> > >> Rejected due to piuparts regression - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/g/glib2.0.html
> > >
> > > But https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/g/glib2.0.html says that all
> > > binary packages were successfully tested, except for the udeb (which as
> > > far as I know is excluded from piuparts testing).
> > >
> > > https://piuparts.debian.org/testing2sid/source/g/glib2.0.html also looks
> > > good.
> > >
> > > Is this a problem with the migration machinery, or is there something
> > > I'm not seeing that needs to be addressed in glib2.0?
> >
> >
> > Last time we had something like this (bug #1102538) was when we had
> > older/cruft versions still around in unstable (I think that's a
> > (unfiled?) piuparts bug) that olasd has on his radar.
>
> glib2.0 appears to be stuck again:
>
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=glib2.0

Again:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=glib2.0

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha