Hi Xiyue Deng, On Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:03:55 -0800 Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry I missed your previous email. I also got confused that even if I > tried to build using `sbuild --source-only-change' it still generates a > *_amd64.changes, and by default it doesn't provide a *_source.buildinfo > and so debsign fails to sign *_source.changes. So I signed the other > *_amd64.changes and uploaded that, which apparently had the same effect. > > So it turns out I can make *_source.buildinfo a symlink to > *_amd64.buildinfo and it will let debsign pass. I have now reuploaded > the *_source.changes which hopefully should be intended. Sorry for the > double failure. > > (Also, if there is a way to generate *_source.buildinfo please let me > know :) please do not symlink *_source.buildinfo to *_amd64.buildinfo. I would be very interested in how you made sbuild create a *_source.buildinfo. This is out-of-scope for this bug but I'd like to see a reproducer of this problem and I'd be happy to receive a bug against sbuild for this problem. None of the 303 *_source.changes files that I have locally as leftovers from previous builds with sbuild --source-only-changes point to a *_source.buildinfo.They should not. Thanks! cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature