Bug#1118037: trixie-pu: package aide/0.19.1-2+deb13u2

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed

On Sat, 2025-11-01 at 15:07 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2025 at 11:21:40AM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-10-14 at 09:25 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > after a stable release it usually turns out that the rules that
> > > we
> > > released aide with don't quite fit the rest of the distribution.
> > > It
> > > is kind of impossible to keep up with the changes in the last
> > > weeks
> > > before the release. Trixie is the first time where I'd like to
> > > release an update to the aide package in a stable point release
> > > that
> > > fixes most of those issues to make the package easier to use for
> > > local admins.
> > > 
> > > This time, there is also some additional code :-(
> > 
> > +  * fix issue with 31_aide_lvm which doesn't work properly in the
> > +    non-root daily job: Implement bin/buildcache, run that from a
> > root
> > +    timer and have the rule print the cache.
> > 
> > I may be misunderstanding, but it looks like the first two parts of
> > this - "Implement bin/buildcache, run that from a root timer" are
> > already present in the trixie package, and the actual change being
> > introduced here is just the "print the cache" portion?
> 
> Yes, printing the cache is what makes the code work. Without that,
> the cache is built but not used. That fell off the table when
> preparing trixie. This is completing the work.

Thanks for confirming.

In that case, I wonder whether it would make sense for the changelog
entry to clarify which changes are part of new upload, rather than
suggesting that the buildcache script is newly added.

In any case, please go ahead.

Regards,

Adam