[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1116501: marked as done (transition: bamtools)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:18:01 +0200
with message-id <6144b431-e0a8-4d75-8c4c-ce6cda3fb468@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1116501: transition: bamtools
has caused the Debian Bug report #1116501,
regarding transition: bamtools
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1116501: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1116501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: bamtools@packages.debian.org, domibel@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:bamtools
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

I uploaded bamtools 2.5.3 to unstable, but I didn’t realize that some packages depend on it.

I would like to request a transition for bamtools to coordinate rebuilds of reverse dependencies.


Ben file:

title = "bamtools";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libbamtools2.5.2" | .depends ~ "libbamtools2.5.3";
is_good = .depends ~ "libbamtools2.5.3";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libbamtools2.5.2";


Thanks
-Dominique

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 28/09/2025 10:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:

Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 28/09/2025 02:52, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: bamtools@packages.debian.org, domibel@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:bamtools
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

I uploaded bamtools 2.5.3 to unstable, but I didn’t realize that some packages depend on it.

I would like to request a transition for bamtools to coordinate rebuilds of reverse dependencies.


It would have been nice if you had specified whether the reverse dependencies
build fine against the bamtools 2.5.3. See the wiki page [1] for the transition
workflow.

Since I don't want to waste time and the transition is small and there are
basically no conflicts, I just went ahead and scheduled the rebuilds. Let's see
how that goes.


And it migrated. Closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: