[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1115414: marked as done (transition: Qt 6.9.2)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:06:44 +0200
with message-id <ea4ec12b-2daf-44e8-8d85-364dd9e4f4b4@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1115414: transition: Qt 6.9.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1115414,
regarding transition: Qt 6.9.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1115414: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1115414
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: deltaone@debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi Release Team,

we would like to request a transition for Qt 6.9.2 which is currently
available in experimental.
We have the usual ABI changes for the private headers and one binary
package (qml6-module-qtquick-nativestyle) has been removed. The only
reverse dependency of qml6-module-qtquick-nativestyle (shotcut) has
already removed the dependency.

I have not done any rebuilds yet, but if you create the transition page,
it'll me which packages need to be rebuild and crucially in which order.

Once I've done those rebuilds, I'll get back to you.


Ben file:

title = "Qt 6.9.2";
is_affected = .depends ~ /qt6-.*-private-abi \(= 6\.8\.2\)/ | .depends ~ /qt6-.*-private-abi \(= 6\.9\.2\)/;
is_good = .depends ~ /qt6-.*-private-abi \(= 6\.9\.2\)/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /qt6-.*-private-abi \(= 6\.8\.2\)/;


Thank you very much.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 22/09/2025 14:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:

Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 20/09/2025 22:25, Patrick Franz wrote:

Hi Emilio,

Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2025, 09:39:09 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit
schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
[...]

Added, it will appear in a couple of hours on the transition page.


I rebuilt every package against Qt 6.9 with the following results:

* layer-shell-qt & qcoro: The build results in symbol errors. But the
packages are maintained in our team and we can fix them easily once Qt
6.9 hits unstable.

* pyside6: The version in unstable fails to build, but the version in
experimental is ready for Qt 6.9 and will need to be uploaded once Qt
6.9 is in unstable.

* qtcreator: Fails to build, but a patch is available upstream. Bug filed
at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1115520.

* itinerary: 1 unit test is failing. Bug filed at https://
bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1115743.

* gammaray: 1 unit test is failing, but I suspect it could be my setup
as upstream is explicitly supporting Qt 6.9 and the failure is about
translations/locales.


Go ahead.


Qt 6 has migrated. Closing.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: