Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:59:36 +0200 with message-id <8ec8a8e5-f9e1-43c8-a208-3d23d0101f7f@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1114794: nmu: proftpd-mod-case_0.9.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1114794, regarding nmu: proftpd-mod-case_0.9.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1114794: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1114794 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: proftpd-mod-case_0.9.1-1
- From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 23:17:54 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] aMCZgmJh4QM7THeZ@rasppi3>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-mod-case@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-mod-case User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-case_0.9.1-1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev" nmu proftpd-mod-clamav_0.14~rc2-5 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev" nmu proftpd-mod-kafka_0.1-1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev" nmu proftpd-mod-msg_0.5.1-1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev" nmu proftpd-mod-prometheus_0.2-1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev" nmu proftpd-mod-proxy_0.9.5-1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev" nmu proftpd-mod-proxy-protocol_0.5-1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev" nmu proftpd-mod-tar_0.4-3 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev" nmu proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.12-1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev"Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>, 1114794-done@bugs.debian.org, Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
- Subject: Re: Bug#1114794: nmu: proftpd-mod-case_0.9.1-1
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:59:36 +0200
- Message-id: <8ec8a8e5-f9e1-43c8-a208-3d23d0101f7f@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 348b2da1-a47e-473c-8531-66026f933c6c@debian.org>
- References: <[🔎] aMCZgmJh4QM7THeZ@rasppi3> <[🔎] cf49aea1-8e59-4851-96d6-dcf2c0d6c71b@debian.org> <[🔎] aMCZgmJh4QM7THeZ@rasppi3> <[🔎] aMHtd0rWwul6CSuY@rasppi3> <[🔎] aMCZgmJh4QM7THeZ@rasppi3> <[🔎] 348b2da1-a47e-473c-8531-66026f933c6c@debian.org>
On 18/09/2025 08:48, Paul Gevers wrote:Hi Hilmar, On 9/10/25 23:28, Hilmar Preusse wrote:On 10.09.25 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu@debian.org) wrote:On 09/09/2025 23:17, Hilmar Preusse wrote:nmu proftpd-mod-kafka_0.1-1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev" nmu proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.12-1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with proftp-dev"Of course these do not need rebuilds, here failed the build on hurd-amd64.I've read this bug report twice now, and I'm not understanding which binNMU's you now want. Can you please regenerate the list you're requesting?The original request was confused. I think Hilmar believes the failure on hurd is fixed in proftpd-dfsg and those packages can be given back. I have done that now.Cheers, Emilio
--- End Message ---