Bug#1111166: marked as done (transition: wolfssl)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Sep 2025 22:43:23 +0200
with message-id <aMco6xRg_J57DSBl@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1111166: transition: wolfssl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1111166,
regarding transition: wolfssl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1111166: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1111166
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: wolfssl
- From: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 10:36:47 +0200
- Message-id: <175524700738.96696.2079561442148360952.reportbug@duagon-BXN3S64.localdomain>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: wolfssl@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:wolfssl
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi Release Team,
Please assign a transition slot for wolfssl. I am requesting on behalf
of the package maintainer.
All reverse dependencies build with the exception of kamailio, see
#1111162. Downgrading libmongoc-dev makes kamailio build with the
experimental wolfssl version.
The new wolfssl has a license update from GPL-2+ to GPL-3+. I have
changed swupdate not to build with wolfssl anymore because it is GPL-2
licensed. I have not seen any other problem in the reverse dependencies.
Ben file:
title = "wolfssl";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libwolfssl42t64" | .depends ~ "libwolfssl44";
is_good = .depends ~ "libwolfssl44";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libwolfssl42t64";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>, 1111166-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1111166: transition: wolfssl
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 22:43:23 +0200
- Message-id: <aMco6xRg_J57DSBl@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <aLKfLnrcEI6wZ--F@ramacher.at>
- References: <175524700738.96696.2079561442148360952.reportbug@duagon-BXN3S64.localdomain> <175524700738.96696.2079561442148360952.reportbug@duagon-BXN3S64.localdomain> <aLKfLnrcEI6wZ--F@ramacher.at>
On 2025-08-30 08:50:22 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2025-08-15 10:36:47 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: wolfssl@packages.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:wolfssl
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Hi Release Team,
> >
> > Please assign a transition slot for wolfssl. I am requesting on behalf
> > of the package maintainer.
>
> Please go ahead
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: