[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1112067: marked as done (transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-17)

Your message dated Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:43:48 +0200
with message-id <aL8x9PqTjbD6i_5j@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1112067: transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-17
has caused the Debian Bug report #1112067,
regarding transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-17
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1112067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1112067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release team,

The mainstream Qt version is 6.x nowadays, but many packages are still
using Qt 5. So I want to request a transition for updating it from 5.15.15
to 5.15.17.

The transition is prepared in experimental and there are no known blockers.
Qt WebEngine will be updated to 5.15.19.

I have submitted a merge request with the ben file:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/transition-data/-/merge_requests/60

--
Dmitry Shachnev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2025-09-01 21:00:38 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2025-09-01 20:48:54 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian!
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 08:51:51AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 - confirmed
> > >
> > > Unfortunately the reverse dependencies are affected by the recent upload
> > > of cmake 4.x to unstable. Let's wait until those have been fixed (or at
> > > least the number of FTBFS is somewhat reduced).
> > 
> > It looks like cmake was reverted to version 3.31.6 in unstable.
> > 
> > At least three of cmake-4 bugs are in my packages, I will try to take care
> > of them, although it shouldn't block the transition anymore.
> 
> Indeed, let's go ahead and try to finish this before cmake 4 is uploaded
> again to unstable.

The stack mgirated.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: