[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1111594: marked as done (transition: proftpd-dfsg)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Sep 2025 11:18:12 +0200
with message-id <aLv8VOXid6riwL6J@rasppi3>
and subject line Re: Bug#1111594: Acknowledgement (transition: proftpd-dfsg)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1111594,
regarding transition: proftpd-dfsg
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1111594: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1111594
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-dfsg@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg

This transition was already started by the recent proftpd upload, but is
not caught caught automatically since it is a virtual package name that
has changed.

Ben file:

title = "proftpd-dfsg";
is_affected = .depends ~ "proftpd-abi-1.3.8c" | .depends ~ "proftpd-abi-1.3.9";
is_good = .depends ~ "proftpd-abi-1.3.9";
is_bad = .depends ~ "proftpd-abi-1.3.8c";

Hilmar

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 19.08.25 Debian Bug Tracking System (owner@bugs.debian.org) wrote:

> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
> 
> You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1111594: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1111594.
> 
Transition is done, close the request.

Hilmar

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: