Bug#1111010: release.debian.org: phase out armel for forky
Control: clone -1 -2 -3
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable
Control: reassign -3 buildd.debian.org
Control: retitle -3 buildd.debian.org: stop building armel on forky and unstable
On 2025-08-22 13:25:33 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2025-08-13 17:40:26 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 13-08-2025 16:28, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > Now that forky is open, would it be possible to start removing armel
> > > from the lists of architectures that "matter"?
> >
> >
> > We're intending to remove armel from testing soon. I seem to recall there
> > was a reason why we might want to keep it longer during the cycle, but I
> > can't recollect the reason and I can't seem to find it in my inbox (might
> > have been on IRC or IRL. If nobody can reproduce the reason, we'll probably
> > act within a couple of days/weeks. It already came up on IRC this week.
>
> I intend to merge
> https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/tree/armel-removal by
> the end of August and will then ask FTP to remove armel from forky.
This is now done. Cloning and reassigning to also remove armel from
forky and stop building packages for it. Unless there are any plans by
the armel porters to move armel to ports, please do the same for
unstable.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: