[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1110776: marked as done (transition: mapnik)



Your message dated Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:51:37 +0200
with message-id <aLKfeRmQpfYa3i2T@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1110776: transition: mapnik
has caused the Debian Bug report #1110776,
regarding transition: mapnik
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1110776: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1110776
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: mapnik@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:mapnik
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mapnik.html

Mapnik bumped its SONAME in 4.1.0 which requires a transition.

All three rdeps built successfully as summarized below.


Transition: mapnik

 libmapnik4.0 (4.0.7+ds-1) -> libmapnik4.1 (4.1.2+ds-1~exp1)

The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.

 libapache2-mod-tile (0.8.1-1)                    OK
 python-mapnik       (1:0.0~20240222-5ab32f020-4) OK
 tirex               (0.8.0+ds-1)                 OK


Kind Regards,

Bas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-08-23 06:45:16 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 8/22/25 10:36 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2025-08-11 07:52:23 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> > > Mapnik bumped its SONAME in 4.1.0 which requires a transition.
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> Thanks. mapnik (4.1.2+ds-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now built & installed on all release architectures except riscv64 which is too slow to build all packages in a reasonable time.

The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply to: