Bug#1111475: release.debian.org: glib2.0 "Rejected due to piuparts regression" but no obvious regression

[Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>]

Hi,

On 18-08-2025 14:13, Simon McVittie wrote:
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=glib2.0 says, among other
> things:
>
> > Rejected due to piuparts regression - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/g/glib2.0.html
>
> But https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/g/glib2.0.html says that all
> binary packages were successfully tested, except for the udeb (which as
> far as I know is excluded from piuparts testing).
>
> https://piuparts.debian.org/testing2sid/source/g/glib2.0.html also looks
> good.
>
> Is this a problem with the migration machinery, or is there something
> I'm not seeing that needs to be addressed in glib2.0?


Last time we had something like this (bug #1102538) was when we had 
older/cruft versions still around in unstable (I think that's a 
(unfiled?) piuparts bug) that olasd has on his radar.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature