[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1060367: marked as done (release.debian.org: RFC: Transitions check for dupload?)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2025 18:53:15 +0200
with message-id <aKC3e_hi8DH8X6ca@thunder.hadrons.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1060367: release.debian.org: RFC: Transitions check for dupload?
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060367,
regarding release.debian.org: RFC: Transitions check for dupload?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1060367: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060367
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hi!

I've had for a while a new hook for dupload that adds a transitions
check for Debian hosts, for sourceful uploads targeting unstable (to
avoid disrupting buildd or porter uploads, or uninteresting suites).
I've just finished polishing it, and the main lingering question I've
had all along has been whether you think this would actually be useful
and/or desired at all, see below.

The hook is currently using
https://release.debian.org/transitions/export/packages.yaml, and
prompting in case that source package is part of any ongoing
transition. I wondered also whether checking
https://ftp-master.debian.org/transitions.yaml would be useful,
but I'm not sure whether that is or has ever been used?

You can see the commit at
<https://git.hadrons.org/cgit/debian/dpkg/dupload.git/commit/?h=pu/transition-check>.

For a package currently under transitions such as dart, the hook
output and interaction could be right now:

,---
Source dart is part of ongoing transitions:
  auto-tinyxml2 boost1.83
Continue anyway? (yes/NO)
Ok, aborting upload.
`---

So I guess my questions would be whether you think this is helpful or
useful at all? If so, whether the criteria is adequate or it needs to
be changed? Whether this should be a prompt, or maybe only an info or
warning? And any other comment or suggestion you might have!

Thanks,
Guillem

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi!

On Thu, 2025-08-14 at 20:34:18 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 02:35:18 +0100 Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> wrote:
> > JFYI, I released dupload 2.11.0 with support for the mentioned
> > transitions check hook. Have not received any complaints (yet? :).
> 
> I guess this bug can be closed now? Or maybe reassigned to dput and
> dput-ng if those haven't seen the request to add such a hook.

Yes! Have had a browser tab open on this report as a reminder to come
back to this, thanks! :) I've now checked and there were already two
bugs filed (dput: #673343; dput-ng: #802175), which I've email an update
referencing this report with the discussion and the implementation in
dupload.

Closing this report now.

Thanks,
Guillem

--- End Message ---
Reply to: