[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1109532: marked as done (unblock: kicad/9.0.3+dfsg-1)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:52:43 +0200
with message-id <906e549b-f761-4c21-b196-54e704c4bee0@debian.org>
and subject line close all open unblock requests, the trixie release happened
has caused the Debian Bug report #1109532,
regarding unblock: kicad/9.0.3+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1109532: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109532
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: kicad@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:kicad
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package kicad

The upstream project of KiCad did release the third bugfix release for
the KiCad main project about two weeks ago. As usual these releases do
fix various small and sometimes bigger glitches like segfaults.

On the Debian side two patches from Simon Richter are applied to
decrease the footprint of bin related binary build steps.

[ Reason ]
The newer version is including beside the usual bug fixes also some
backported features from the current development. But of course users do
also like to have known issues fixed by a newer version.

[ Impact ]
The only impact is on the KiCad package itself, users will not be able to
use some newer backported functions and fixed issues.

[ Tests ]
Due the nature of the package (GUI based software) we don't have any
tests that can do some usual typical tests like creating a project or
modifying existing projects.
I do always test newer KiCad versions locally with some of my own
projects, this includes open older projects created by older versions of
KiCad, doing some basic things like adding new elements to schematics,
working on parts in the parts libraries etc and build up PCB files.

[ Risks ]
The upstream code changes looks mostly hughe due the nature of C++, but
KiCad has so far I know no reverse dependencies so the I believe the
risk to break something in the archive is quite zero.
Upstream does a lot testing and has also a big user base, if some nasty
regression is happen a new bugfix relase is prepared also rather
quickly.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 0e82a314e..ddc85f6d3 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+kicad (9.0.3+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Simon Richter ]
+  * [b6cdb99] Only configure directory that will be built
+  * [ac26b99] Split off build dependencies for documentation
+
+  [ Carsten Schoenert ]
+  * [0be6357] New upstream version 9.0.3+dfsg
+
+ -- Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de>  Wed, 16 Jul 2025 09:55:56 +0200
+
 kicad (9.0.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * [2c5aa4f] New upstream version 9.0.2+dfsg
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 3b21fd91c..18e90ebb4 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -6,18 +6,11 @@ Uploaders:
  Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de>,
  Georges Khaznadar <georgesk@debian.org>,
 Build-Depends:
- asciidoctor,
  chrpath,
  cmake,
- dblatex,
  debhelper-compat (= 13),
  dh-python,
- docbook-utils,
- docbook-xsl,
- doxygen,
  dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1.1~),
- fonts-freefont-ttf,
- fonts-vlgothic,
  gettext,
  git,
  imagemagick,
@@ -51,7 +44,6 @@ Build-Depends:
  libunicode-linebreak-perl,
  libwxgtk3.2-dev,
  libxml2-utils,
- lmodern,
  pkgconf,
  po4a,
  protobuf-compiler,
@@ -60,6 +52,16 @@ Build-Depends:
  python3-wxgtk4.0,
  source-highlight,
  swig,
+ unixodbc-dev,
+Build-Depends-Indep:
+ asciidoctor,
+ dblatex,
+ docbook-utils,
+ docbook-xsl,
+ doxygen,
+ fonts-freefont-ttf,
+ fonts-vlgothic,
+ lmodern,
  texlive-fonts-extra,
  texlive-lang-chinese,
  texlive-lang-cyrillic,
@@ -73,7 +75,6 @@ Build-Depends:
  texlive-lang-polish,
  texlive-lang-spanish,
  texlive-xetex,
- unixodbc-dev,
  xmlto,
 Rules-Requires-Root: binary-targets
 Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/KiCad/kicad.git -b debian/sid
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 3ed21db67..39e25c0be 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ override_dh_auto_configure:
 	###################################
 	# configuring KiCad documentation #
 	###################################
-	dh_auto_configure --sourcedirectory=$(CURDIR)/doc --builddirectory=$(DEB_BUILD_DIR)/doc -- $(DEB_DOC_CMAKE_OPTS)
+	dh_auto_configure -i --sourcedirectory=$(CURDIR)/doc --builddirectory=$(DEB_BUILD_DIR)/doc -- $(DEB_DOC_CMAKE_OPTS)
 
 override_dh_auto_build-arch:
 	##############################


[ Other info ]
This is a very similar unblock request like
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2025/05/msg01086.html
as it would be really nice to have the latest release of the KiCad
application within trixie.

unblock kicad/9.0.3+dfsg-1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,
I'm sorry we couldn't unblock your request in time for trixie. I'm closing all open unblock requests in one go, so I'm not going into details of the particular request, but reasons are typically as follow: 
- the request came after the deadline of 2025-07-30
- the request came late and we just didn't have the time to deal with it
- the request was waiting for action from the submitter (moreinfo tag)
- the request didn't appear to be in line with the freeze policy and we
  didn't have the energy to engage (sorry for that, see our FAQ [1])
- there was discussion in the unblock request but no agreement was
  reached in time for the release.

Paul

[1] https://release.debian.org/trixie/FAQ.html

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: