Re: Bug#1110222: release-notes: some words about armel arch?
Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> --- i/source/issues.rst
> +++ w/source/issues.rst
> @@ -41,6 +41,23 @@ possible, or retiring the hardware.
> `Cross-grading <https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading>`__ without a
> reinstall is a technically possible, but risky, alternative.
> +.. _armel_last_release:
> +
> +Last release for armel
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +From trixie, armel is no longer supported as a regular architecture:
> +there is no Debian installer for armel systems, and only Raspberry
> +Pi Zero, Zero W and 1 are supported by the kernel packages.
Elsewhere we've mostly standardised on "serial comma", which would
mean "Raspberry Pi Zero, Zero W, and 1" - that seems clearer to me.
Or we might want to reorder it as "Raspberry Pi 1, Zero, and Zero W"
if that was the order the models appeared in (I assume "1" is the
2012 version that originally didn't have a version number).
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Reply to: